Skip to content
Traffic BeesTraffic Bees InternshipSEO reflection

Recurring client work

Forum and brand-mention research

Alongside backlink research, I searched online discussions for places where a client could be mentioned in a way that helped the person asking. Answers resulting from this work were posted on Quora.

Scope

What the work involved

My part was to find online discussions where a client could be mentioned in a way that helped the person asking, and to assess whether contributing to them was a realistic opportunity.

The unit of work was a single discussion. For each one I recorded where it was, what the person was asking, whether the thread was still active and whether a mention of the client would answer the question that had been asked.

Method

Finding the discussions

Discovery was search-led. I looked for the questions a potential customer would type and followed them into the places where other people had answered them.

  1. 01

    Start from the question

    Search the way a customer would, using the wording someone uses when they are undecided.

  2. 02

    Check thread recency

    Look at the date of the last substantive reply and judge whether the discussion is still active.

  3. 03

    Read what is being asked

    Establish whether the person wants a recommendation or something a brand mention would not answer.

  4. 04

    Check the community context

    Read the rules and the existing replies to see how commercial contributions are treated.

  5. 05

    Record the decision

    Log the discussion as suitable or unsuitable with the reason attached to it.

Judgement

Filtering for realistic opportunities

Candidate discussions were filtered on whether they represented a realistic opportunity for the client. Relevance was quickly established and settled little on its own, so the filtering turned on recency, the community context and the promotional risk of posting there.

The checks applied to each discussion
CheckWhat I looked atWhat would rule it out
RecencyDate of the last substantive replyA thread with no recent activity
IntentWhat the original poster asked forA question a product recommendation does not answer
Community contextStated rules and how similar posts were receivedA space where promotional replies are removed or unwelcome
Promotional riskHow a brand mention would read to the participantsA contribution that would read as advertising
FitWhether the client genuinely suits the need describedA mismatch between the request and what the client offers

Two discussions can pass identical checks and still differ in whether a mention would be welcome, because that depends on what the participants are asking for. The checks narrowed the field and each thread still had to be read.

Where the filtering stopped

Where I could not establish that a contribution would be appropriate, the discussion was recorded as unsuitable. Promotional risk and the moderation position of the community formed part of that assessment.

Output

Answers posted on Quora

Answers resulting from this research were posted on Quora. Writing them was a separate skill from finding the question, since each answer had to address what was asked and mention the client only where it genuinely belonged.

Outcome

Value and limitations

Value to the company

The work produced a documented set of discussions with a recorded assessment for each, including those judged unsuitable, and answers posted on Quora in discussions where people were asking for recommendations.

Impact of this work

I did not track how those answers performed, so I cannot report reach or referral figures. The same research discipline is described on the backlink research page.