Insight
Qualifying backlink opportunities with Ahrefs
Discovery produced more candidates than could be reviewed properly, so the working question was which of them were workable opportunities for a client with a limited budget.
Sections on this page
The question this article answers
How was discovery data turned into a judgement about whether a prospect was workable for an SME client?
Drawn from: Ahrefs research during backlink opportunity work for client campaigns.
Discovery
Where the candidates came from
Competitor backlink profiles in Site Explorer (opens in a new tab) were an important source, because a publisher already linking to a competing business has demonstrated an interest in the subject. Batch Analysis (opens in a new tab) was useful for comparing many candidates at once so that a long list could be ordered before manual review.
What the tools describe is a domain. The decision being made concerned a specific page and whether a link would sit in it naturally, so the tool output set the order of work and the page decided the outcome.
Qualification
What qualification actually involved
Qualification meant opening the page and reading it for a passage that already made the point the client's page supports. A roundup mentioning a topic once in a list has no sentence a link could extend without inventing a reason for it.
This also cut the other way. A site with lower metrics could still contain a more suitable article, even where bulk comparison had placed it low in the review order.
Feasibility
Commercial feasibility for SME clients
In the backlink research, SME campaign budgets made commercial feasibility part of qualification. An attractive publisher becomes unsuitable when its expected fee exceeds a realistic campaign budget, so a strong report does not settle the question.
Checking for stated pricing early kept research hours on opportunities the campaign could actually pursue, and it moved attention towards smaller publishers with a genuine audience in the client's subject. The result was a process assessing overall suitability, taking the page and the commercial position together.
Counter-argument
The case against page-level qualification
Reading every page is expensive, and there is an argument that a campaign with enough outreach capacity is better served by screening quickly and accepting some waste. A longer list of plausible candidates may then produce more placements than a short list of well-argued ones.
For the campaigns I researched, the budget was limited, so the value of a list came from how many of its entries were workable within that budget.
